<< Home    |   ZAMLII Discussion Board

 

 

    

Mvunga (1991)

EXECUTIVE

1.      THE PRESIDENCY

The commission therefore recommends that there should be an executive president who should be head of state and government.

This is accepted.

2.      ELECTION OF PRESIDENT

The commission recommends that the Zambian President should be popularly elected by adult suffrage as at present.

This is accepted but elections should be by universal adult suffrage through secret ballot.

3.      DATE OF PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS

The commission recommends that presidential elections should be held on the first Thursday of September after every five years. Commissioners wished to see the independence celebrations every five years coincide with the granting by people, of a new mandate to govern to the politicians. In a small way, the people would cultivate devotion to national interests immediately after campaigning along party lines. Thus a national event would heal the divisions that might have been generated by party passions.

This is not accepted. Fixing a specific date is unrealistic given the likelihood of natural disasters and other occurrences beyond control.

4.      QUALIFICATIONS

 

1.      CITIZENSHIP

The commission debated these propositions carefully and by a majority agreed that to qualify for the office of President the candidate:

a.       Must be a Zambian citizen born in Zambia;

b.      His/her parents must be Zambians born in Zambia of Zambian citizens.

 

This is accepted but should read as follows:

a.       Must be a Zambian citizen; and

b.      Both his/her parents must be Zambians by birth;

c.       Has been a resident in Zambia for 20 years.

This is not accepted.

1.      AGE

The commission was of the view that as the voters were the best judges, there were no good reasons advanced, which would compel a departure from the status quo and accordingly recommends that:

a.       The minimum age should remain at 35 years and

b.      There should be no maximum age limit.

These are accepted.

 

1.      EDUCATION

The commission recommends that there is no need to put education as a qualification for the office of president. It was sufficient that a candidate was conversant in English.

This is accepted.

2.      MORAL INTEGRITY

The commission observed that the question of moral integrity tended to be highly subjective and did not favour the inclusion of moral qualification in The Constitution. The commission felt that good character was all that was necessary.

This is accepted.

3.      FINANCIAL STANDING OF A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE

The commission recommends that:

a.       A person’s financial standing should be a qualification for presidential elections;

This is accepted.

b.      A candidate should not be entitled to take part in a presidential election unless he or she makes a statutory declaration of his/her assets and liabilities which should be open to public inspection at such time and place as may be prescribed by an Act of the National Assembly.

This is accepted.

 

1.      POLITICAL AFFILIATIONS

In this respect, the commission recommends that an independent presidential candidate should be eligible for elections. This is consistent with the proposed bill of rights and democracy.

This is not accepted because Zambia is committed to multi-party democracy. As such, every effort should be made to promote party politics. Moreover, the proposal may not be efficacious for Zambia because he/she may not be able to form a government.

2.      RELIGION

The commission found no justification in putting religion as a qualification and recommends that religion should not be used as a requirement for presidential office.

This is accepted.

 

3.      CERITFICATE OF GOOD HEALTH

 

It was the commission’s view that matters relating to good health, like an upper age limit are best left in the wisdom of the voter. Accordingly, a certificate of good health should be a prerequisite for a presidential election.

This is accepted.

 

4.      RECOMMENDED QUALIFICATIONS FOR PRESIDENT

The commission recommends that a person should be qualified as a candidate for election as President if:

a.       He/she is a citizen of Zambia born in Zambia;

b.      His or her parents were/are Zambian citizens born in Zambia;

c.       He/she has attained the age of thirty-five years;

d.      He/she is of good character; and

e.       He/she is otherwise qualified to be elected as a member of the National Assembly.

These are accepted as amended under 11.4.1(a) and (b) above.

1.      TERM OF OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT.

The commission recommends that every president should hold office for a period of five years and should be eligible for re-election to one more five- year term.

This is accepted and no person who has twice been elected president should be eligible for re-election to this post.

2.      SUPPORT OF REGISTERED VOTERS FOR A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE

The commission recommends that a candidate should not qualify as a presidential candidate unless he is supported by not less than one hundred registered voters from each province.

This is not accepted because the present requirement of 200 registered voters all round is adequate.

3.      PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE TO QUALIFY FOR ELECTIONS TO THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY.

The commission therefore recommends that a presidential candidate should be allowed to stand for parliamentary elections and upon assumption of office of president resign the National Assembly seat.

This is not accepted.

4.      AN INCONCLUSIVE PRESIDENTIAL POLL

The commissioners considered Article 34(8), which envisages an inconclusive presidential poll. The commission appreciates that there was a need to clarify the provision so as to reflect clearly the intention that where no presidential candidate receives more than fifty percent of the votes, a further poll should be taken for the first two candidates, and that in the event of equality of votes in that election, the National Assembly should elect the President.

This is not accepted. The president should win by a simple majority.

5.      VACANCY IN THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

The commission proposes a new political scheme where the Vice-President would be running mate of the president, and consequently, a vacancy in the office of the president would automatically imply that the vice president takes over the functions, duties and powers of the office of president.

This is not accepted. The president should continue to appoint the vice president.

11.10 THE HAND-OVER OF POWER

1.      PERIOD OF HANDOVER

The commission recommends that there be a thirty-day period for a smooth transfer of power. During this period the incumbent President will be responsible for the day to day administrative duties of the office of the President but would make decisions only with the consent of the president should elect on important matters. In particular, the out-going president should neither initiate serious policy relating to war, state of public emergency or threatened emergency should only be invoked with the consent of the president –elect.

This principle is accepted subject to the following:

a.       The incoming President is sworn in immediately after being declared winner;

b.      The period of hand over is 14 days; and

c.       The outgoing president should not initiate policy measures, make any appointments to public office or invoke the provisions relating to declaration of war, state of public of threatened emergency;

 

1.      ENCOURAGEMENT OF A CULTURE OF HANDOVER

The commission recommends that an administrative mechanism supported by the adoption of precedents from other countries be devised to allow the incumbent president meet and congratulate the winner publicly.

This is accepted.

10.  PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION PETITION

In order to expedite petitions relating to presidential elections, it is recommended that such petitions should lie directly to a full bench of the Supreme Court.

This is not accepted because the provisions of Article 44 in the present constitution are adequate.

11.  FUNCTIONS OF THE PRESIDENT

The commission recommends that the president be granted the traditional functions of a head of state and head of government, and in particular the president should:

a.       Formulate the policy of the government;

b.      Accredit, receive and recognise, ambassadors, and appoint ambassadors, plenipotentiaries, diplomatic representatives and consulates;

c.       Pardon or reprieve offenders;

d.      Negotiate and with the approval of the national Assembly, sign international agreements and treaties and delegate the power to do so;

e.       Establish and dissolve government ministries and departments subject to the approval of the National assembly;

f.        Confer honours on citizens, residents and friends of Zambia in consultation with interested and relevant persons and institutions;

g.       Appoint such persons as are required by The Constitution or any other law to be appointed by him;

h.       Sign and promulgate any proclamation which by law he is entitled to proclaim as president;

i.         Initiate laws for submission to and consideration by the National Assembly; and

j.        Have supreme command over the armed forces.

These are not accepted because functions of the president are already provided for under Article 44 of the present constitution.

 

10.  IMPEACHMENT OF THE PRESIDENT

The commission accepted the traditional grounds for impeachment which includes gross misconduct, abuse of office, violation of The Constitution and laws and wilful violation of the Oath of office.

This is noted.

11.  PROCEDURE OF IMPEACHMENT

The commission recommends that with respect to the impeachment of the president, the provision in Article 37 were adequate. However, the choice by the Chief Justice of members of the tribunal should not be limited only to persons who hold or have high judicial office. In this way, the Chief Justice would be afforded wide scope to empanel a tribunal from other distinguished jurists who might not or may never have held high judicial office.

This is not accepted because the provisions of Article 37 of the present constitution are adequate.

12.  ORDER OF PRECEDENCE

The commission thought that it would be wise to address the question of the order of precedence of holders of state offices, and recommends that the president should take precedence over all persons in Zambia, and in descending order, the Vice President, the Speaker of the National assembly and the Chief Justice, should take precedence over all persons in Zambia.

This is not accepted because it is not a constitutional matter.

13.  PRESIDENTIAL BENEFITS AND EMOLUMENTS.

The commission was of the view that a retired president should only be entitled to one or pension irrespective of whether he/she served one or two terms.

This is not accepted because this matter is appropriately covered under Act No. 40 of 1993, titled "Benefits of Former President’s Act"; and also Benefits of Former Presidents (Amendment Act No. 33 of 1994). The commission recommends that the President’s pension benefits should be protected along the lines of Article 42(3) of the present constitution and that every retired President should be entitled to only one pension regardless of the period he/she served in the office of the president.

This is not accepted because it is already in the present constitution.

14.  CABINET

Petitioners wished to see a retention of Cabinet consisting of:

a.       The President

b.      The Vice President and

c.       Ministers

This is noted.

10.  THE VICE PRESIDENT

1.      ELECTION OF THE VICE PRESIDENT

The commission recommends that in the light of the logic of political considerations and the wishes of the majority of petitioners who addressed the subject, the Vice President should be a running mate of the President

This is not accepted.

2.      DISCHARGE OF PRESIDENTIAL FUNCTIONS BY THE VICE PRESIDENT.

The commission recommends that provisions similar to those contained in Article 39 and 45(4) should be reflected in the new constitution.

This is noted.

3.      VACANCY IN THE OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT

The commission recommends that the succeeding President should nominate the vice president from the National Assembly and the National Assembly should be requested to ratify the candidate. Further, in the event of a denial of ratification, the president should make another nomination to the National Assembly and if the National Assembly still refused ratification, the president should give the national assembly three more names from which the national assembly would be obliged to elect a Vice-President.

This is not accepted because it is already covered under Article 38(3) of the present constitution.

4.      SIMULTANEOUS VACANCIES IN THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT.

The commission recommends that as much as possible judges should remain above politics and should not be considered for political office even in the event of a vacancy in the office of the president and the vice president. However, the speaker of the national assembly is closely connected to political affairs and is a much better alternative. The commission therefore, recommends that where both the office of the president and the office of vice president fall vacant at the same time, the speaker of the national assembly should assume the office of vice president for a period not exceeding ninety days for the purpose of ensuring that elections to the offices of president and vice president are held within the said period.

This is not accepted because of the reasons advanced at 11.18.3 above.

 

5.      QUALIFICATIONS AND REMOVAL OF THE VICE PRESIDENT.

The commission recommends that as the vice president was constitutionally qualified to perform all the duties relating to the Office of the President, he too, would be entitled to enjoy the same qualification and suffer similar disqualifications as those that apply to the President.

This is not accepted for reasons advanced at 11.9.

11.  MINISTERS

The commission unanimously recommends that:

a.       Ministers should be appointed from outside the National Assembly, from among the citizens of Zambia on the basis of ability, merit, and experience, and such appointments should be subject to ratification by the national assembly.

This is not accepted because in reality, strict adherence to the doctrine of the separation of powers in impracticable. It is, therefore, desirable that people who initiate policy should be able to defend it inside parliament and that ministers should be able to defend it inside parliament and that ministers should be appointed from inside parliament.

b.      In the event the president appoints a member of the national assembly to a ministerial post that member should thereafter resign his/her seat.

This is not accepted in view of the reaction at (a) above.

1.      NUMBER OF CABINET MINISTERS

The commission recommended that there is need for The Constitution to provide a total number of not more that eighteen (18) Cabinet Ministers.

This is not accepted.

2.      FUNCTIONS OF THE CABINET

The commission recommends that in keeping with the new constitutional design, cabinet should essentially be an advisory body of the president. Thus, in all respects ministers should be responsible for such business of the government including administration of any ministry or department of government, as the president may direct.

This is not accepted because of the decision at 11.19. (a), above.

3.      MINISTERIAL ACCOUNTABILITY

The commission recommends that there continue to be collective accountability of cabinet to the national assembly. In addition, individual ministers should be accountable to the president and the National Assembly for the administration of their ministries. This is accepted subject to the removal of the words "and the National Assembly".

4.      VOTE OF NO CONFIDENCE

The commission recommends that:

a.       The national assembly should have power to pass a vote of no confidence in individual ministries but not in the entire cabinet. This is not accepted because ministers are accountable to the president as individuals and as part of the executive. They are accountable to the National Assembly as a collective group and as such a vote of no confidence in individual ministers would be contrary to the principle of collective responsibility.

b.      The national assembly should have no power to pass a vote of no confidence on the president whose mandate to govern is derived from the people.

This is accepted.

c.       A minister in whom a vote of no confidence has been passed should be removed from office by the president.

This is not accepted for reasons given at (a) above.

 

1.      QUALIFICATIONS OF MINISTERS.

The commission recommends that there should be no special qualifications for appointment to the office of minister but the minimum requirements for election to the National Assembly should be observed.

This is accepted.

2.      ASSISTANT MINISTERS

The commission recommends that ‘deputy ministers’ should not be given powers to deputise ministers. Strictly speaking, they are merely assistants and their duty is to assist ministers in the performance of their functions. To address this change in the nomenclature from the usage of ‘Deputy Minister’ to ‘Assistant Minister’.

This is not accepted.

 

2.      ATTORNEY GENERAL

The commission recommends that the Attorney General should be appointed by the president subject to ratification by the National Assembly.

This is not accepted because the provisions of Article 54 of the present constitution are adequate.

10.  THE SOLICITOR GENERAL

The commission recommends that the Solicitor General, who, in the absence of the Attorney General should exercise the powers of the Attorney General, be appointed by the president subject to ratification by the national assembly. The commission noted that in practice the attorney general and solicitor general work very closely with each other, and for this reason The Constitution should settle beyond doubt the solicitor general’s right to discharge the functions of the attorney general in the latter’s absence

This is not accepted because the provisions of Article 55 of the present constitution are adequate.

11.  THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS

The commission recommends that in the interests of safeguarding the independence of the Director of Public Prosecutions. This conclusion is fortified further on account of the need to remove completely any executive influence on the criminal justice system. In a similar vein, the commission recommends that the Director of Public Prosecutions should be appointed by the Judicial Service Commission subject to ratification by the National Assembly.

This is not accepted because the provisions of Article 56 of the present constitution are adequate.

 

Further, the commission recommends that in the interest of justice and fair play, the Director of Public Prosecutions whenever entering a nolle prosequi, or whenever he discontinues a prosecution commenced by another person or authority, be obliged to give reasons to the court.

This is not accepted.

12.  SECRETARY OF THE CABINET.

The commission recommends that in consultation with the Public Service Commission the president should appoint the secretary to the Cabinet subject to ratification by the national assembly.

This is not accepted. The president should appoint the secretary to the Cabinet subject to ratification by the National Assembly.

13.  APPOINTMENT OF PERMANENT SECRETARIES

The commission recommends that Permanent Secretaries should be appointed by the Public Service Commission on the basis of professionalism, merit and experience.

This is not accepted. The president should appoint permanent secretaries in consultation with the secretary to the cabinet.

 

 

Composition and Appointment of the commission

Constitutional Development of Zambia

General Principles

Directive Principles of state policy

Citizenship

Democratic Governance

Fundamental human rights and freedoms

Enforcement machinery of human right

Economic, social and cultural rights

State of emergency

Executive

Legislature

 

 

 

Home | About ZAMLII | Law Staff | What's New | The Constitution | 1991 Constitution | constitution Act (1991) | 1996 Constitution | constitution Act (1996) | Mvunga (1991) | Mwanakatwe (1996) | Acts | Attorney Directory | Court Ruling | Draft Report | High Court | Supreme Court | Industrial Relations Court | Land Tribunal | Lecture Series | Legal Institutions | Legal Scholars | Parliamentary bills | Revenue Tribunal | Student Essays | Other Links | Contacts

 

 

Site Designed & Hosted by ZAMNET Communication Systems ltd. Webservices™ 2002